<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s In A Name? Protecting Farmers Market Integrity through a Common Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition</link>
	<description>Farmers markets are good for everyone.  Join us to make them even better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Quinn</title>
		<link>http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition/comment-page-1#comment-135572</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/?p=1827#comment-135572</guid>
		<description>The BC Association of Farmers&#039; Markets is beginning the same process of needing to define a farmers&#039; market so your comments are very helpful.

Thanks for thinking this through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BC Association of Farmers&#8217; Markets is beginning the same process of needing to define a farmers&#8217; market so your comments are very helpful.</p>
<p>Thanks for thinking this through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a Farmers Market? &#124; The Farmland Report</title>
		<link>http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition/comment-page-1#comment-42653</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a Farmers Market? &#124; The Farmland Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/?p=1827#comment-42653</guid>
		<description>[...] market systems- clarity and honesty. So at the beginning of this year, I wrote a piece called ‘What’s in a Name?’ for the market beet, FMC’s newsletter, outlining some of the challenges faced by the farmers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] market systems- clarity and honesty. So at the beginning of this year, I wrote a piece called ‘What’s in a Name?’ for the market beet, FMC’s newsletter, outlining some of the challenges faced by the farmers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Mattson</title>
		<link>http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition/comment-page-1#comment-30170</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Mattson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/?p=1827#comment-30170</guid>
		<description>Yes, I strongly agree that “farmers selling directly to the public products they have produced” should be the whole idea of any community event that labels itself &quot;farmers market&quot;.  

I&#039;ve struggled with that since moving to Tucson from Boulder several years ago.  Right now, the Tucson area has 22 &quot;farmers markets&quot;, according to the most comprehensive list, published weekly.  Only the three markets run by the Community Food Bank require and limit those able to sell to those who grow what they sell.  Three others have a small base of direct marketing farmers and ranchers, but the numbers are limited -- primarily because we also have a limited number of producers available to direct sell at farmers markets.  

Another issue here is the tendency of our &quot;farmers markets&quot; to operate year round.  Depending on the market manager, there may be little leeway to not show up 52 weeks each year -- a strain on any local producer.  Also, the year-round market ignores any opportunity to educate consumers on seasonality of local fruits and vegetables.  Instead, there&#039;s a steady supply of produce from California and Mexico brought to these same markets by distributors.  Only the seasoned and dedicated &quot;local&quot; customer bothers to ask the right questions.

Here, the most common definition of &quot;foodshed&quot; might include four counties surrounding Tucson: Pima, Pinal, Santa Cruz and Cochise -- covering farmers, ranchers, orchardists and other producers within about 100 miles.  Some argue that our foodshed should also include parts of northern Mexico as well, with a common historical food heritage.

Back to the farmers markets.  Here in Tucson, more than half of the &quot;farmers markets&quot; include only one producer/vendor who may have fresh produce, a small portion of which that vendor actually grew!  The rest of the vendors are artisans, other types of products and perhaps a chair massage.  At least three of the new markets in the last year are located at shopping centers and malls -- as “attractions” to bring customers to the permanent mall businesses in a sagging economy.

My belief is that broad customer education is the only workable way to address these &quot;market&quot; conditions -- combined with serious efforts to increase the number of new food producers (whether farmers or urban gardeners) who are interested and willing to grow food for others here in the Sonoran Desert.  

I agree we need to reduce the confusion of Sprouts and Sunflower -- neither of which carry locally produced fruits and vegetables on anything other than an intermittent basis.  

Still, our apparent inability to supply our &quot;farmers markets&quot; with enough farmers is a much more serious and long term issue.  This is where the focus needs to be today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I strongly agree that “farmers selling directly to the public products they have produced” should be the whole idea of any community event that labels itself &#8220;farmers market&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve struggled with that since moving to Tucson from Boulder several years ago.  Right now, the Tucson area has 22 &#8220;farmers markets&#8221;, according to the most comprehensive list, published weekly.  Only the three markets run by the Community Food Bank require and limit those able to sell to those who grow what they sell.  Three others have a small base of direct marketing farmers and ranchers, but the numbers are limited &#8212; primarily because we also have a limited number of producers available to direct sell at farmers markets.  </p>
<p>Another issue here is the tendency of our &#8220;farmers markets&#8221; to operate year round.  Depending on the market manager, there may be little leeway to not show up 52 weeks each year &#8212; a strain on any local producer.  Also, the year-round market ignores any opportunity to educate consumers on seasonality of local fruits and vegetables.  Instead, there&#8217;s a steady supply of produce from California and Mexico brought to these same markets by distributors.  Only the seasoned and dedicated &#8220;local&#8221; customer bothers to ask the right questions.</p>
<p>Here, the most common definition of &#8220;foodshed&#8221; might include four counties surrounding Tucson: Pima, Pinal, Santa Cruz and Cochise &#8212; covering farmers, ranchers, orchardists and other producers within about 100 miles.  Some argue that our foodshed should also include parts of northern Mexico as well, with a common historical food heritage.</p>
<p>Back to the farmers markets.  Here in Tucson, more than half of the &#8220;farmers markets&#8221; include only one producer/vendor who may have fresh produce, a small portion of which that vendor actually grew!  The rest of the vendors are artisans, other types of products and perhaps a chair massage.  At least three of the new markets in the last year are located at shopping centers and malls &#8212; as “attractions” to bring customers to the permanent mall businesses in a sagging economy.</p>
<p>My belief is that broad customer education is the only workable way to address these &#8220;market&#8221; conditions &#8212; combined with serious efforts to increase the number of new food producers (whether farmers or urban gardeners) who are interested and willing to grow food for others here in the Sonoran Desert.  </p>
<p>I agree we need to reduce the confusion of Sprouts and Sunflower &#8212; neither of which carry locally produced fruits and vegetables on anything other than an intermittent basis.  </p>
<p>Still, our apparent inability to supply our &#8220;farmers markets&#8221; with enough farmers is a much more serious and long term issue.  This is where the focus needs to be today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/farmers-market-definition/comment-page-1#comment-28592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farmersmarketcoalition.org/?p=1827#comment-28592</guid>
		<description>I agree with the spirit of what is said in this article ... but do I see the term &quot;Farmers&#039; Market&quot; soon to become a legal entity like &quot;Organic&quot; and we will be forbidden to use it unless we go through a expensive and exhaustive certification process to &quot;prove&quot; we are who we say we are? It seems the people who started organic and farmers&#039; markets do so from a very personal belief and they are the ones who are soon turned off (and out) of the equation. We farmers are an independent lot. I hope we have larned A LOT from the &quot;organic&quot; movement and will just take our crops and sell them to the public based on who we are and what we believe and not on what we have &quot;certified.&quot; Yes, it is OUR responsibility to education our consumers. If we fail in this, look for another take-over... (i.e., NAIS) Let&#039;s sure hope not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the spirit of what is said in this article &#8230; but do I see the term &#8220;Farmers&#8217; Market&#8221; soon to become a legal entity like &#8220;Organic&#8221; and we will be forbidden to use it unless we go through a expensive and exhaustive certification process to &#8220;prove&#8221; we are who we say we are? It seems the people who started organic and farmers&#8217; markets do so from a very personal belief and they are the ones who are soon turned off (and out) of the equation. We farmers are an independent lot. I hope we have larned A LOT from the &#8220;organic&#8221; movement and will just take our crops and sell them to the public based on who we are and what we believe and not on what we have &#8220;certified.&#8221; Yes, it is OUR responsibility to education our consumers. If we fail in this, look for another take-over&#8230; (i.e., NAIS) Let&#8217;s sure hope not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

